Peter Haff on the Technosphere

technosphere

Peter Haff is an earth scientist who thinks that technology has become an autonomous system: the technosphere. This isn’t a metaphor; it’s a real, physical thing.  And he’s begun identifying rules that describes its behavior.

Read his article and listen to the conversation (coming soon) that Matt Luedtke and I had with him.  There’s some big ideas here, but it’s head-scratching stuff.  And it sometimes borders on the sci-fi.  Are environmentalists really serving the technosphere’s interests by preventing its demise?  Is the best solution to pollution an increase in energy use?  Does the technosphere (and other systems) have a purpose?

I’m left with these takeaways:

  • We need to better understand technology, and do so in a holistic, systems-based way.  Prof. Haff says that our current, popular idea of technology is similar to the way people viewed biology before the concept of “the biosphere.”
  • If we recognize the technosphere as a real thing, this would alter the way we view environmental problems and – as a result – the potential solutions.
  • If humans are dependent on the technosphere, we need to re-think environmentalism to consider the needs of the technosphere, and do so in a way that is consistent with human happiness.
  • Environmentalists need to formulate a vision for the future that is dynamic. The current idea seems to be a static picture of nature-human coexistence…a Garden of Eden before the fall.  Prof. Haff reminds us that the Earth is a chaotic place, prone to disruptions and crises and flux.  How can we imagine a future that is possible to pursue and worthwhile to do so, yet takes into account inevitable change and evolution?
Advertisements

Environmentalism Evolving

Andrew Light makes a confession in a recent essay, “The moral journey of environmentalism: From wilderness to place.”  He says:

I never had a profound wilderness experience.

Caspar_David_Friedrich_-_Wanderer_above_the_sea_of_fog

This is odd because, as Light puts it, “environmentalism is seen as a calling not unlike the ministry.  We answer in this case not to a holy spirit but to nature itself…”

So why is Light an environmentalist?  Because there are reasons to be.  Light worries that “the formidable experiences of the environmentalist are to be found in the realm of feeling or emotion rather than rational thought.”

Continue reading